PDA

View Full Version : Digidesigns dirty secrets


The Truth
10-29-2001, 06:55 PM
here's a thread that digi censored off their own forum :

wartortle
Member
Member # 13234
posted October 29, 2001 01:47 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hello Digidesign Developers,
By now I am sure you are aware that Windows XP has been released and is the standard operating system shipping on PCs. That is, if I went to the local CompUSA and purchased a PC, it would come with Windows XP preinstalled, not Windows 98 or ME. I don't know if you can even buy Windows 98 or ME in the stores anymore. Why would you want to? My point here is that my brand spanking new computer would not be 'Pro Tools Ready', because it's too up-to-date. I realize that you are keeping the release date of your XP upgrade secret to foil the plans of other companies and trick them into releasing their updates first, but still, it would be nice to give we, the people silly enough to purchase your hardware some vague estimate of when the amazing update will be released. True, you guys are probably spending all of your time adding features to the decrepit TDM platform and working on RocketNetwork support that we poor LE lot can't use, but you've got to have at least a low-paid developer or two working on the XP update. Right?

Oh and what about DirectConnect, ASIO drivers, and QuickTime support. Oh I can't stop laughing... By the way, how about upping the 24 track limit? Maybe just by one? 25 tracks? Please? 24 and a half?

Mr Tortle.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

wartortle
Member
Member # 13234
posted October 29, 2001 01:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, and one point I forgot to mention in my previous post. Microsoft has been pretty forthcoming in their announcements about Windows XP's release. It wasn't a closely guarded secret, so one would figure that perhaps given the knowledge that Windows XP would be coming out in late 2001, Digidesign would hand some developers the betas and tell them to get crackin' on the port. That way, they'd be able to support it upon release. However, it seems that is not the case. Perhaps in the current financial market Digidesign is too poor to afford television sets, Internet access, or newspapers. If this is truly the case, I am willing to purchase a nice overpriced TDM system to help fund Digidesign so that they can afford to keep current.
Let me know.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Digi Engineering
Administrator
Member # 618
posted October 29, 2001 04:47 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you really looking for information, or did you just come here to insult us?
Eric Day
Digidesign


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Digi9000000
Member
Member # 13994
posted October 29, 2001 04:54 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
isn't that obvious?
who has all this time, that they can flame all day?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

DigiKing
Member
Member # 22775
posted October 29, 2001 05:37 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To DigiDesign Engineers
I Respect Protools and Digidesign for all they have allowed me to do. My questions are this.

Will Digidesign even support the XP platform? To my Knowledge they did'nt support windows 2000. Commenting on the last user post about upgrading the track count. Surely 24 tracks is not enough these days given the complexity of some home users recording sessions. Could'nt you up the count to at least 32(if not More) and keep the 24 on the digi tool box level? Even though there are other programs that offer higher track counts, I feel that Protools is a Superior program and I choose to work in that domain.

What about post production support. If I could I would upgrade to the Mother of them all but I can't. Nuendo(inferior Program) offers that support and I know that's your competition so maybe you are considering it.

Higher Midi channels would be a dream. At Least 48 Channel support.

Lastly, Mac and Pc Equality. I'm a pc user and I'm Frustrated that mac has many more features that I would use but are not supported on the Pc Platform, if the digioo1 is cross-platform, then should'nt all of the goodies, plug-ins etc.. be made to cross also?.

Thank You
Dedicated Protools User


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

kdotson
Member
Member # 19359
posted October 29, 2001 05:54 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a shout out to all the digi Design Engineers. Pro Tools LE is great. Yes it has it's flaws, but to me that's a limation to the platform that it runs on. It disturbs me when Digi001 users get flamed, because there is no support for XP yet. Well maybe they don't consider all the R&D cost that go into porting "things" over. Also if anyone would understand the Digi001 is a home recording studio. Not a Professional. It can be used as a Porfessional, but it was not meant to be. For the amount of money the 001 cost to me right there is a cost savings. You can do everything you can in a real professional recording studio. Anyone that has worked with a SSL and 2in tape would really appreciate the DIGI001. I think the real problem is this. Since the DIGI001 is so easy and simple to setup people are spoiled. Most of the users don't even have the recording concept down. So they think the unit should do things it shouldn't. And one more thing. The most succesful people are people that can adapt. Quit complaing and adapt. Or just go out and buy full TDM.
--------------------

-Krug


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Cirxuser
Member
Member # 15349
posted October 29, 2001 06:11 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Digi Engineering:
Are you really looking for information, or did you just come here to insult us?
Eric Day
Digidesign


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Eric , if you read the post carefully u would notice the spirit it was written in was not insulting.Most people dont use the DUC to flame,and I dont consider this guys post as a flame.To me he came across as one of tens of thousands of people who use and love digi products,but get very frustrated when they perceive a loss of direction or a lack of support.

Tounge in cheek posts like this give all of us a chance to have a good comunal chucle about things that make u white-knucle your mouse and swear out loud most of the time.U must understand that most of us who bother to use this board swear by digi gear,faults an all,and we are your best advertisement.We are out there each and everyday not only using your product but also telleng everybody we can find how great it is.Sometimes somebody better informed turns around and tells u "hey hang on with the promotion,what about this feature and that one" and you stand there feeling a little like an idiot.So when someone comes to you to blow off steam a bit the last thing u should do is start acting like a child.Dont you know that excerts from this forum gets posted all over the internet?One always perceives digi as a profesional,addept,if somewhat aloof,but together company,and then someone like u comes along.

And to make matters worse,u did not shed any light on any issue raised by the user,u did not even attemt to answer his quiestions.Which leads me to beleive that you have to be somewhere at the bottom end of the ladder at your company,cause if you are anywhere near management,thats it,game over.

We are all here to help your company create better products,even those of us who get a little personal in their posts.Who could have been a loyal costomer(and probably was) is now another enemy , and i wont even mention the impression of your company gathered by potential customers who happened to read your reply.

In the past posts like this was generaly ignored by digi staff,because they know that when another user realy gets out of line the other members will soon shut him down,but u obviously lack this insight .But when,at the root of a users rants and raves(and jokes),there lies a genuine problem or concern,the least,if any,response from digi should be to appear helpfull, even if they werent aware of the problem or concern,have not made a contigency plan or adopted a policy regarding it , or , such as in your case , appear to be on the verge of mental instability .

I, Eric , unlike the (ex)user who started this thread , am posting this with the sole intent of insulting you , because you deserve no less . And I sincerely hope that the forum moderator deletes your post. They have deleted posts of mine for a lot less in the past . The greater majority of forum members always aim to be at the very least constructive , and set that sort of tone for the forum . Therefore a post like yours , considering the fact that you are attemting to represent the company that brought all of us here , is an utter and almost unforgivable disgrace.

S!
Peter deVries


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

DigiKing
Member
Member # 22775
posted October 29, 2001 06:14 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I appreciate the digi001 for the cost and it's cababilites
And Yes I have worked on the 80input SSL9000J and SSL4000J with the G automation and The NeveVR72. And if I'm working or assisting on a Mix Session it's ususally around 48 tracks, so I do appreciate the cababilites of Digi001. And If I had the 10Gs for a Mix Plus 3 system not to mention 50GS for a 48 channel Procontrol, I would Have it. Digidesign may have not intended it for professional use, but you can best belive that Professionals do use it and can't help but to expect professional results because of how we been shaped and mold. It's one thing of working with the Big Boy at work, and it's another thing of doing side projects at home. So I don't think of it as complaining, more of a user feedback type of thing. If Digidesign Keeps seeing the same questions ask over and over and there are enough people saying the same thing, then it becomes a money issue along with possibly cornering another aspect of the market, if they have not corner it yet.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

wartortle
Member
Member # 13234
posted October 29, 2001 06:25 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Digi Engineering:
Are you really looking for information, or did you just come here to insult us?
Eric Day
Digidesign
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh, Eric, must you by so cynical? Give Mr. Tortle the benefit of a doubt.

I'd like to know the following:

1) When will there be an update to Pro Tools LE to allow use under Windows XP.
An approximate date or even something nebulous like 'Q1 2003' would be quite helpful and informative. If the release date is far in the future, what reason does Digidesign have for not supporting the now-standard PC operating system?

2) Is DirectConnect for the PC something Digidesign developers made up as a rotten joke on the users, or will it ever be released? If the answer is the latter, approximate release date?

3) ASIO Drivers for PC? Same question(s) as above.

4) 24 tracks?

Tort.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

zedhed
Member
Member # 16111
posted October 29, 2001 06:25 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's all about money.....of course. Why would digidesign want to make 001 too good a package, when their ultimate goal is too get people into TDM systems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Flexx
Member
Member # 18477
posted October 29, 2001 06:31 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Insulting or not,
How does Digidesign expect new comers who have just bought a computer to buy into the Digi001? Or even Pro Tools TDM? Isn't it asking a bit much to expect a user to buy Pro Tools and then go try and find a outdated copy of windows? Many people who are pro's use Win2k or now, WinXP. And yes Pro's are using the Digi001. Perhaps it was never intended to be that way, but it's more true now than ever. With stronger and faster computers many artist, producers and composers would never need anymore than the Digi001. This has be said over and over again.
I have my Digi001 sitting in a box like new while I've been using Neundo w/UAD-1 powered plugins. Both with Win2k drivers and both work in WinXP also. The Digi001 is very convient with it's direct mic-inputs, monitor and headphone jack. But not providing Win2k drivers (WinXP also) takes away from the convience, if you have a new powerful computer (like the two I just built) and want to be able to take advantage of Win2k and WinXP features such as stability and memory management.

Flexx

PS. I don't think any *Digidesign customers* here has the intention to be insulting. The insult, or actually slap in the face if you will, is Digidesign not providing us with updated drivers for the OS that is not only becoming the standard for regular household users, but has been for Pro's. What kind of customer appreciation is that?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

wartortle
Member
Member # 13234
posted October 29, 2001 06:33 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by zedhed:
It's all about money.....of course. Why would digidesign want to make 001 too good a package, when their ultimate goal is too get people into TDM systems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, but Digi must know by now that 'home studio' users are not blind and that they tend to notice things like the fact that Nuendo (not to mention programs like Logic Audio and Digital Performer) can achieve a much higher track count, have similar editing capabilities (well, Nuendo at least ), can integrate far better with virtual instruments/samplers, have tighter and better MIDI capabilities, and work with far more audio hardware. I'm willing to bet that there are at least 90% more 001 users that have migrated to other platforms than there are users who switched to TDM.

Now, I'm not dismissing TDM or PT LE here entirely. I'm just saying that Digidesign needs to come up with some more compelling reasons to keep the high price tags.

Tort-n-Torty

ThunderRoadPost
11-05-2001, 08:30 AM
You think it's a "dirty secret" that Digi is slow to release updates for new operating systems? Well, it's nice to see that you've finally gotten around to pulling your head out of the sand.

Personally, I'd rather wait for a stable revision of an application than have a company fire off a quick update and then have to use patch after patch after patch to exterminate the multitude of bugs that will infest the hastily engineered software.

But what do I know? I'm on a stable system already: MacOS 9.1. And my TDM system runs just great on it!

http://www.audioforums.com/forums/biggrin.gif

Flex
11-05-2001, 04:25 PM
more dirty secrets

Last
Member
Member # 9768
posted November 04, 2001 12:49 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am starting this thread to highlight some eronous(in my opinion) marketing strategies that led to the limitation of tracks on the 001 system. I would like to invite other users to show their support for or against this thread,which is a request to Digidesign to loosen the code that prohibits the use of more than 24 tracks , to something more reasonable,like 32.
I want to stress some points though before I post this :
- I am aware that this thread will get the heads up of those users who religiously defend Digi with the "U know what u bought before you bought it" argument.I would like to take this oportunity to ask such users to understand that we all knew what we bought,and we are all happy with what we paid for,but that taking pride in this product is becoming increasingly dificult due to the fast paced development of other competitors.None of us want to work on another platform and most of us would like a TDM system but can either not afford one,or cant get our wives to agree to buy one .Standards change and improve and so should products.It is not for us to decide Digi's policies , but these policies should also be flexible and adaptable as times change and expectations with them.Now,two years later,I fell,along with many others ,that the 001 systems has lost its lead in the marketplace , and we would like to see it regained . It is true that the Digi interface is one of the best out there.Digi is well aware of this.Once one has mastered the PT interface it becomes very difficult to re-learn another.Hence the release of PTFree.But that alone is not enough to warrant such drastic limitations on the program as is seen on the 001 system,especialy on the PC side.
I would like this thread to be purely a "yes I want 32 tracks,or no I dont I'm happy" and
what everyone's own thoughts on the issue are.
-It is well known that the 24 track limit on PT is not there because of system limitations,but is 100% artificial,iow its a deliberate code that was put there for marketing reasons.
-That no realistic upgrade path exists between the 001 product and the next product up the ladder.In fact the price difference between the entry level and the next step(TDM) in more than 1000%, and due to Digidesign's untransparent marketing policy,it is impossible to tell whether this is due to change anytime soon.

I would also like to express my opinion regarding the school of thought that something like track limiting will impact possitively on the marketing of TDM systems:
I beleive that the issue of latency alone is more than enough to ensure the continious viability of TDM DAW systems.The second is raw computing power,in the form of DSP.iow the ability to run hundreds of Plugins over many tracks,eg 64 or 128.These differences clearly illustrate the gap in performance between LE and TDM systems,and I have no problem with that.It is my belief that issues such as track limitation (to 24) and smaller ones,like selection of discontiguous regions(discussed in a recent thread) serve no purpouse in either enhancing TDM sales , or maintaining TDM cusomer satisfaction .I think it started out as a minor setback,and is leading , as similar products improve,to major irritation and even hostility.I for one would like to see that change.
I would like to hereby then start a petition requesting a legal 32 track version of PTLE,or alternatively a version where track count is limited by CPU power alone , maintaining ProTools' excellent audio quality of course.I would not like to enter into dicussions regarding the marketing of this with any Digi-fundamentalists.I think that is best left to the company themselves,be it as an upgrade,or a step up,sold seperately or whatever.

Also please lets not discuss any illegal track software or program glitches out there in this thread,as I would not like to task Digidesign's already overworked and underpaid forum moderators more than is appropriate.


--------------------

All the Best
Peter deVries

peter@triplane.net
Tripnale Music


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

upetewd
Member
Member # 20410
posted November 04, 2001 12:59 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Every day i'm leaning more towards ditching the digi001 because of one thing after another. Tracks should be limited by your cpu, not the software, EVERY other software on the market has this ability.
YES, I opt for unlimited tracks (whatever your cpu can handle).

Dave


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Shan
Member
Member # 17462
posted November 04, 2001 01:10 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I Agree. Please Digi, let the track count be based on cpu power. Give us more tracks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Last
Member
Member # 9768
posted November 04, 2001 01:19 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Shan,sorry to hear about your other thread.Was bound to happen.Did you get my email?
--------------------

All the Best
Peter deVries

peter@triplane.net
Tripnale Music


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Princeton
Member
Member # 14675
posted November 04, 2001 05:56 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You've got my vote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

phdumas
Member
Member # 15119
posted November 04, 2001 06:07 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count me in!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

APAULOS
Member
Member # 21691
posted November 04, 2001 06:45 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32 would be nice. You can forget about unlimited though...That would mean that the people running fast athalon systems would have a higher track count than the TDM systems.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

King Kong
Member
Member # 21722
posted November 04, 2001 06:48 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, 32 tracks are reasonable.. and I will be very happy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Mr_Seven
Member
Member # 18172
posted November 04, 2001 07:31 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32 tracks would be a fair compromise, especially with the speed at which computers are moving today. Here's my vote.
32 Tracks please on the pro gratis winXP update.

--------------------

Darren Valen www.cyberdreamstudios.com (http://www.cyberdreamstudios.com)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

QuikDraw
Member
Member # 10206
posted November 04, 2001 08:58 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would like to see all artificially imposed software limitations removed from PTLE. That includes Beat Detective, SMPTE ruler, discontiguous region selection and others. And better sync capabilities such as ADAT sync.
It almost seems silly to ask Digi to replace one self imposed limitation with another... Why ask for 32 tracks. We'll just want more next year. Let's just ask that the host computer be the only factor imposing a track count limitation. Or...

One of the great things about ADAT or DA-38 was that you could expand your track count at will, based on how much $$ you were willing to spend. How about PTLE-24, the basic software that's bundled with the Digi 001 at around its current price. And then PTLE-Unlimited for a few hundred dollars more. Maybe PTLE-Unlimited could have some of the other features put back in that were taken out of basic PTLE.

Well, that's my two cents on the matter.

Mike


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

J DisComing
Member
Member # 22958
posted November 04, 2001 09:15 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey folks, I'm currently using Adats and other popular softwares, But i'm thinking about swithing to Pro tools Le because i love the program but i would really like to have more than the standard 24 Tracks. So if the Big guys looking down should really look into this as this would truly increase your sales
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

DigiKing
Member
Member # 22775
posted November 04, 2001 09:54 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
32 tracks at the minimum. The digi should host at least 48 if not unlimited. let the cpu system determine if you'll be able to run 32 or more tracks.
too many competitors offer more tracks. let 24 be for the toolbox. The digi001 can't compete with a tdm system. so it won't hurt if you

UP THE TRACK COUNT!!!!!!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

skman
Member
Member # 10921
posted November 04, 2001 10:05 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Got my vote !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

stut5
Member
Member # 16918
posted November 04, 2001 10:18 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I agree 100% let your system decide its own limitations.If they want a few more bucks I would pay for an upgrade.Stu T
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

trimid
Member
Member # 21260
posted November 04, 2001 11:52 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make 2 versions. One 24 trk. and one unlimited. And let the consumer decide which one best serves their need.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

KaiXXX
Member
Member # 20364
posted November 05, 2001 03:01 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More tracks, please!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Keith Lowdon
Member
Member # 19594
posted November 05, 2001 04:50 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More talent please! Oops I mean tracks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

rockit
Member
Member # 22970
posted November 05, 2001 07:02 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i'm not sure that an unlimited track count would be possible under the current pro tools environment but 32 would make my job a lot easier. when i bring projects home from the studio i have to decide which tracks i can cull and sometimes when everything needs to be edited, i have to hire a TDM system. (usually cheaer than a studio)
pc/mac compatibility was a god send for people in my situation and 32 tracks PLUS the inclusion of the command focus mode would make it a lot less frustrating to use LE. i find editing rather slow and clumsy without command focus.
cheers
~matt


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Mark_Knecht
Member
Member # 17825
posted November 05, 2001 07:41 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Make one version and let me pay some money to go beyond 24 tracks when I decide I need it. No installation changes to get there when I need to.

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by trimid:
Make 2 versions. One 24 trk. and one unlimited. And let the consumer decide which one best serves their need.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

mjames08
Member
Member # 18014
posted November 05, 2001 10:06 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm down for 32 tracks.. Or I could just continue to bounce my sessions down and open them in a new session for unlimited tracks..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Last
Member
Member # 9768
posted November 05, 2001 12:45 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its looking great!keep it coming guys,this could become the best test of the "we always listen to our customers" thingie ever
--------------------

All the Best
Peter deVries

peter@triplane.net
Tripnale Music


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Mocha
Member
Member # 14262
posted November 05, 2001 12:54 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm in all the way Baby, more tracks, more connections to the outside world, like VST and DIrectX. C'mon DIGI. SHow us that you do listen, and you'll own the world.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Paul Curtiz
Member
Member # 7265
posted November 05, 2001 03:07 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What bothers me is how they sort of decide to ignore what everybody knows.
I would agree if Digi came out and said something along the lines of "look, we want to have a product out there that's 100% stable and reliable and 24 tracks does that just fine, 32 is a bit rocky right now. We'll get there, but right now we're sticking with 24..."
But (correct me if I'm wrong) are they now deleting threads which mention the 32 tracks ?
I'd hate to be banned for this, but there's a version of PT Free out there with ... well 32 tracks. I know it, Digi knows it, everybody in this busines knows it.
Now, please, Digi people, bear with me : I'm a registered Digi001 user, and I've bought every upgrade there is. I've even just bought a second Digi001 for my home use. Somebody comes along and says "I've got this 32 track version of PTFree, wanna check it out ?", I guess even every Digi engineer would take a peek. In our business, we are confronted with cracked software all the time.
Most of us know where they stand and I stand right here : I do not agree with software piracy.
But to act like it's just not there ? Especially on a sensitive issue like "more tracks" which everyone's been screaming for ?
You (Digi) are the guys who are great at putting us straight : please tell me I'm wrong and you didn't delete that thread or please give us a word of explanation about why you did it.
Do you really think I'm going to start using a buggy, cracked version of your software (albeit with 32 tracks) while I make a living using the official one ?
I have nothing but respect for a company that gives its customers an outlet like the DUC for expressing our concerns, working out probs and tons of fun.
This is not a democracy, and Digi is out there to make a living just like me.
But there must be a better way.


--------------------

Paul Curtiz / Scratch Studio


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Gil Parente
Member
Member # 18147
posted November 05, 2001 03:31 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Guys,
I'm sure Digi is not going to stay behing other manufacturers which produce software with more tracks. It's all just a matter of time.
Also, cracked software has been proven not to work right. I try to stay away from it, as tempting as they are. Not to mention they're illigal.
my 2 cents
by the way, I also would love to have 32 tracks.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

B.Ray
Member
Member # 9523
posted November 05, 2001 04:13 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Gil Parente:
Guys,
I'm sure Digi is not going to stay behing other manufacturers which produce software with more tracks. It's all just a matter of time....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What makes you so sure Gil? It's been limited to 24 tracks since the beginning - 1999.

I read somewhere that the Digi001 was responsible for the majority Avid's profit this year. Things are going well for them...the formula appears to be working...why should they change?

Yeah Last, I'll join your petition.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

B.Ray
Member
Member # 9523
posted November 05, 2001 04:30 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is a very interesting concept. Think about it; a company purposely limits one of its products to increase its overall profit.
This is about profit.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Flexx
Member
Member # 18477
posted November 05, 2001 05:17 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes 32 tracks. Digidesign can do it. The cracked version works well. I've heard this from many people. I'm sure that if Digidesign doesn't up the track limit, they will lose even more customers to Universal Audio and Stienberg.
PS. Stop deleting my post. I paid for my Digi001. It's not my fault there are working cracked 32 track version of Pro Tools out there. I could be using that instead of asking you guys to make one. Right?

Flexx


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

Mr Scary P4P
Member
Member # 9605
posted November 05, 2001 05:21 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Although 32 tracks would be cool, Id rather see WinXP support. The digi001 is targeted at the home user right? Well WinXP HOME EDITION IS OUT! CMON DIGI!
But something tells me NEITHER one is going to happen.

EVEN AN UNSUPPORTED BETA of PTLE for XP would be cool!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| IP: Logged

sreams
11-05-2001, 10:20 PM
"Personally, I'd rather wait for a stable revision of an application than have a company fire off a quick update and then have to use patch after patch after patch to exterminate the multitude of bugs that will infest the hastily engineered software."

In case you weren't aware, Win2K has been available for two years. There is a line to be drawn here. Sure... release when it's stable... that is assumed, but Digidesign's lethargy is inexcusable. So is there rediculous pricing for such a DSP-impaired system.

-S

pokeefe777
12-30-2001, 08:37 PM
Anyone heard any rumors about the (rumored to be upcoming) Digi 002? I hear it's going to be a lightpipe version of the Digi 001... Now if they'd only allow you to use two (or more) of these on a single computer for more I/O, and up the track count to (at least) 32, and maybe (not holding my breath) start supporting DXi plug ins, I might consider buying in to the Digidesign stuff. If not, I'll stick with my Dakota / Montana w/ Logic Platinum, Vegas Audio and Sonar setup.

Don't get me wrong - I like PT, and happen to have a full blown TDM system in my control room at the moment for some work I'm doing with Alien Ant Farm... but I don't care for Digi's treatment of their customer base, nor their pricing... to me (and this is just my opinion) they charge too much for what you're getting when compared to what a fast native DAW is capable of nowdays...


Phil O'Keefe
Sound Sanctuary Recording
Riverside CA http://www.ssrstudio.com
pokeefe777@ssrstudio.com