PDA

View Full Version : AMD testing press release for Digi-001


drastikpup1
03-04-2001, 12:25 AM
Drastik Solutions Press Release 03-01-04


After months of testing Amd based chipset motherboards with the latest sound cards we had a lot of mixed results. We tested motherboards from Asus to Shuttle to come up with a configuration that performed rock solid on many different sound card systems.

We are proud to announce that we have a AMD Digidesign-001 system that has achieved an easy 24tracks and 72 RTAS plug in’s 4 band EQ’s, Compressors, Limiters, Gates, ect.

We tried Durons against Celeron and Thunderbirds against PIII’s using the Digi-001 and will have a full report at the middle of the month. Here are our basik findings thus far with a month of extensive testing having very little problems or lock ups with the Digi-001.

Duron 650 Single drive ata-100 256mg Digi-001 24 tracks yielding 46 RTAS plug in’s

Duron 850 Single drive ata-100 256kmg Digi-001 24 tracks yielding 55 RTAS plug in’s

T-bird 800 Single drive ata-100 256kmg Digi-001 24 tracks yielding 70 RTAS plug in;s

T-Bird 1100 Single drive ats-100 256kmg Digi-001 24 tracks yielding 80 RTAS plug in’s


Of course you will get more performance with 2 drives but the AMD did yield an impressive plug in count.We have through testing discovered the glitch in the via chipset that caused the older chipsets to crash pro tools every time.

The next two weeks will be devoted to pitting the performance of the same demo song with the same video card and ram using a PIII-650,PIII-850, and a PIII-1000Mhz to see the differences.

We sincerely hope that this information and weeks of testing various boards helps give you confidence in us as a Custom Builder of Digital Audio workstations.

If you have questions related to a Drastik System or our testing please contact

Justin Lynch (Chief technical Engineer of Drastik Systems)

Servicom/Drastik Systems 952-835-4951 http://drastiksolutions.11net.com

lyricon
03-20-2001, 03:26 PM
I don't know if you can do this but it would be valuable to compare the Performance with several Mac G4 host based systems as well.
Protools is first a Mac program so it would stand to reason they would design it to run better on a Mac may be?
The plug in/track count comparison is an apples to apples look at the two systems. (no pun intended) It is hard to measure Mac CPU speeds with that of a PC but the bottom line is what you can do in the real world with a given system.
Any Mac owners out their will to give some input to what they can get out of their systems?

Greg N